Hardware Project
pod evaluated: ______________________________
pod evaluating: ___________________________________
total / 25: ___________________________________
| criterion | ✓ |
|---|---|
| Images (5 marks): | |
| uniform size and character | ☐ |
| clearly identify individual components | ☐ |
| document each step of tear-down process | ☐ |
| accurately labelled | ☐ |
| well-integrated into story line | ☐ |
| Website (5 marks): | |
| validated HTML5 | ☐ |
| validated CSS3 | ☐ |
| code properly formatted & commented | ☐ |
| images integrated æsthetically | ☐ |
| inline and summary credits in APA style (see the sample reference page for an example) | ☐ |
| Story (15 marks): | |
| interesting (1–4) | ☐ |
| educational (1–4) | ☐ |
| employs many terms of the basic computer glossary | ☐ |
| employs terms of the basic network glossary | ☐ |
| identifies hardware components | ☐ |
| demonstrates understanding of interactions amongst components | ☐ |
| no Canadian-spelling errors reported by LanguageTool online or desktop checker | ☐ |
| no grammar errors reported by LanguageTool online or desktop checker | ☐ |
| adherence to the word-processing guidelines | ☐ |
touque.ca > Education Commons > 2018-06
[This page last updated 2020-12-23 at 13h09 Toronto local time.]
© 2007–2024 Hersch, Bear & Company Limited. All rights reserved. “Grammar Authority,” “grammarauthority.com,” “touque.ca,” and “Canada’s Thinking Cap” are trademarks of Hersch, Bear & Company Limited. All other trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy | Licence to Copy | How to cite | Contact us
